Appendices
(Only in English)
A few times I have been asked to quote sources such as scientific or classical studies or especially books. I work a lot with classical studies (and have linked to such studies as often as possible) and books, but the readers should understand that these materials are under the Code of intellectual property and that I often can not copy them without obtaining specific authorization. This is generally impossible, firstly because of the politically incorrect content of some of the results that I present here, and secondly because these specific authorizations must of course be paid, and I can not pay all my sources .
In addition, if I quote books, I am faced with a third problem: the fact that most of my readers will not buy the books mentioned, or will not have easy access to them, and, in fact, they can not verify the information, and will remain in doubt regarding the validity of my work. This is why I chose to link my work primarily to the Internet. Internet is a great source for many topics and it has the advantage of being a free (in every way) source that is easy to access for all.
If you prefer books, and if you are skeptical about a data, you can send me an email to marie.cachet@gmail.com and I’ll give you another source.
Here I will put links to a few available studies on various information about human races, as many wanted.
Summary: The authors have made a growth curve of the bi-parietal diameter of the African infant using observations taken on 350 African women who were followed up and delivered in their department.
Over all these curves of growth are smaller than the reference curves used in France. This study is a first contribution to the understanding of the mechanics of obstetrics in the African woman.
2- Table of essential amino acids (pdf)
Please note that the foodstuffs are not sorted alphabetically (due to a translation from the French).
4- The sickness unto death by Søren Kierkegaard (in English)
It is very easy to read this as a non-Christian, Kierkegaard was not a classical religious, and his thought is in fact much closer to the former European philosophy and it is much deeper and interesting than the atheistic existentialist writings of Heidegger, for example.
Atala - A journey to the Golden Age by Marie Cachet 
You wrote “it is very easy to read this as a non-Christian, Kierkegaard was not a classical religious”. Did you mean that you are a non-Christian or that Kierkegaard was not a Christian?
Please excuse the stupid question, my understanding of English is not so good…
Thank you for your comment.
It is not at all a stupid question. I meant both.
Kierkegaard, who presented himself as a Christian (Protestant) was criticized by Church members and accused of not being Christian. The concepts he uses have Christian names, but under a certain angle was not, and was instead deeply rooted in European philosophy (please note that Kiekegaard mentor was… Socrates …) .
This question is very complicated because Christianity itself can be seen as a profoundly European religion, or as a religion that is very foreign to European philosophy. It is a mixture of both, or a failed attempt to replace the European philosophy and religion. Kierkegaard in his concepts, returns to a European religion. A clear example is the following : for Kierkegaard an individ must « go and get » the salvation himself, so to speak. As if the individ must become divine by himself, and is not “saved.” He claims that the « original sin » in the Bible is the classic European philosophical « despair » or « vertigo », but also explains how important it is to fall into despair to get true faith. Which means being « enlightened » in the Allegory of the Cave by Socrates/Plato. The use of these terms is Kierkegaard is repulsive for some who see him then as a religious philosopher.
Kierkegaard, in my opinion and as I have already said, is actually the best and deepest philosopher of modern times, and the religious terms are not a problem at all.
“Kierkegaard, in my opinion and as I have already said, is actually the best and deepest philosopher of modern times…”
That is interesting. I don’t know much about Kierkegaard. Was he a humanist?
Who other modern philosophers do you like? Probably not Nietzche :p How about Immanuel Kant?
Thats pretty amazing I just happened to read Kierkegaard, and now its stated here. His stuff was pretty enlightening. And it seems to be quite true. Excuse me for the ignorance, but where on here can I find the relation between the different races and the neanderthal? Thank you for your time
Nevermind, I apologize I found what i was specifically looking for.
fantastic submit, very informative. I wonder why the other specialists of this
sector don’t notice this. You must continue your writing.
I am sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!